Conclusion
High gaming performance is something that is kind of expected from the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D. Compared to its predecessor (Ryzen 7 7800X3D), however, the cooling options have been greatly improved, paving the way for higher clock speeds. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D has thus advanced especially in terms of multithreaded, but also single-threaded performance. This makes this CPU with 3D V-Cache more versatile – better able to handle multiple usage scenarios.
Conclusion
In terms of gaming usage, not much has changed with the Ryzen 7 9800X3D compared to the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. But that doesn’t mean there is anything wrong. It’s still the case that the Ryzen 7 9800X3D (as well as the R7 7800X3D) is an elite processor for a gaming PC. Highest gaming performance at simultaneously nearly the lowest power consumption.
The power efficiency in games is absolutely top-notch. It’s at a level that Intel’s Raptor Lake Refresh generation processors can’t compete with. What the situation will look like in the case of Intel Arrow Lake, or more specifically, the Core Ultra 7 265K processor, you will find out soon. As we add their tests to the database. At the moment, however, we can state that the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is at the very top in gaming tests. At extremely low resolution (720p) with virtually complete elimination of the contribution of a graphics card, it’s in first place, just above the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. At higher resolutions, the impact of the processor is diminished to the point of being completely negligible. But this is true for all processors – high-resolution gaming performance is determined by the capabilities of the graphics card.
Gaming performance is one thing, and then there’s something that makes a processor a processor – compute performance. This increased by up to 30–35% under heavy load compared to the R7 7800X3D. It’s mainly due to significantly higher clock speeds being reached. These are possible because of better cooling options, and with comparable temperature, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D has about 60W more power consumption. Naturally, this is also reflected in the compute performance, which is therefore higher. In terms of gaming performance, the performance benefits won’t show up that much, as in both cases the processors (both the R7 9800X3D and the R7 7800X3D) are at very low power consumption, well below both temperature and power limits. Anyway, you can keep the new Ryzen 7 9800X3D at the same noise level with a cheaper cooler than it was in the past (for the Ryzen 7 7800X3D).
But with regards to the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, it still can’t be said to be a suitable processor for multi-threaded performance.The latter may have increased significantly, but it’s still in the realm of just eight cores within a single chiplet. There is also some improvement compared to the Ryzen 7 9700X (but this is mainly at the expense of higher power consumption), the Ryzen 7 9800X3D cannot be compared to Ryzen 9s in this respect (multi-threaded performance). Not even with Ryzen 7000s. It’s only the old Ryzen 9 5900X that’s outperformed.
However, when it comes to single-threaded workloads, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D already excels and outperforms even the Ryzen 9 7000s. The discipline in which the predecessor (R7 7800X3D) of this processor lagged behind is one of the strengths for the Ryzen 7 9800X3D. It can also benefit from the very high single-threaded performance in non-gaming, routine use in web or office environments. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is very snappy here, snappier than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. Again, mainly due to the higher single-core boost clock speeds, which can now be cooled more easily.
So not just a single-purpose processor for a gaming PC, but pretty good all-purpose hardware that’s ready for other tasks as well. For multi-threaded use, the competing Intel CPUs will still be faster in this price segment for most cases (because more cores…), but the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is definitely not helpless anymore either. Its capabilities are mostly enough for casual use, but even that is better than nothing.
Above all, the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a top-of-the-line gaming processor that is… well, let’s see if it’s unrivaled (after we finish measuring the Intel Core Ultra 200S processor). You’ll have to wait a tiny bit longer.
English translation and edit by Jozef Dudáš
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D |
+ Large 3D V-Cache with 96 MB |
+ Highest performance for a gaming PC currently available... |
+ ... and at the same time with extremely low power consumption |
+ Relatively good cooling now for a processor with 3D V-Cache as well |
+ Significantly more power-efficient than competing Intel processors |
+ Due to its low power consumption, also suitable for really cheap A620 motherboards |
+ Top-notch efficiency... |
+ ... even in non-gaming environments (multi-threaded or single-threaded workloads) |
+ High and higher multithreaded performance than the older model with 3D V-Cache (R7 7800X3D)... |
+ ... the same goes for single-threaded performance. It is absolutely top-notch |
+ Very high performance per clock (IPC) |
+ Modern 4nm manufacturing process node |
+ DisplayPort 2.0 support |
- Weaker price/multi-threaded performance ratio. In this respect, it clearly lags behind even the Core i7-14700K |
Approximate retail price: 479 EUR |
We would like to thank the Datacomp e-shop for their cooperation in providing the tested hardware
Special thanks also to Blackmagic Design (for DaVinci Resolve Studio license), Topaz Labs (for licenses to DeNoise AI, Gigapixel AI and Sharpen AI) and Zoner (for Photo Studio X license)
- Contents
- AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D in detail
- Methodology: performance tests
- Methodology: how we measure power draw
- Methodology: temperature and clock speed tests
- Test setup
- 3DMark
- Assassin’s Creed: Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Counter-Strike: GO
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM Eternal
- F1 2020
- Metro Exodus
- Microsoft Flight Simulator
- Shadow of the Tomb Raider
- Total War Saga: Troy
- Overall gaming performance
- Gaming performance per euro
- PCMark and Geekbench
- Web performance
- 3D rendering: Cinebench, Blender, ...
- Video 1/2: Adobe Premiere Pro
- Video 2/2: DaVinci Resolve Studio
- Graphics effects: Adobe After Effects
- Video encoding
- Audio encoding
- Broadcasting (OBS a Xsplit)
- Photos 1/2: Adobe Photoshop a Lightroom
- Photos 2/2: Affinity Photo, Topaz Labs AI Apps, ZPS X, ...
- (De)compression
- (De)encryption
- Numerical computing
- Simulations
- Memory and cache tests
- Processor power draw curve
- Average processor power draw
- Performance per watt
- Achieved CPU clock speed
- CPU temperature
- Conclusion
How come Intel 12100F that even has no iGPU is better in value than 14700K in the first graph? (4K H.264, MultiCam Live Playback [avg. fps]) It’s a complete nonsense, you should review your results before posting
Why are you operating with an iGPU that has nothing to do with those results ever? Do you know what “Live Playback” is in Adobe Premiere Pro? Do you know which processor is being loaded to what extent by which task? In the Reddit post you claim that our results show that the Core i3-12100F is the “best” processor for Multicam, which is not true – look for example at the 4K Prores 422 results, where the CPU performance is the bottleneck (where the Ci3-12100F is on the tail).
Why not think about it and come up with a reasonable explanation of why it comes out the way it does in a given test? You don’t have to worry about us neglecting something or writing it wrong in the graphs. Sometimes it happens, but not in this case.