Results: Static pressure w/o obstacles
It took years, but finally DeepCool managed to modernize its fans in the 140mm format as well. The DeepCool FT14s present themselves with very attractive specs – both the airflow and static pressure are above standard, but the key is how these fans will fare in practice compared to competing models. What makes the FT14 visually different from those at first glance is that you can see inside the motor.
Results: Static pressure w/o obstacles
Explanatory note: We measure the static pressure without obstacles in two different situations – with laminarized and with turbulent intake. The results in this section reflect the first case. That is, the air intake to the impeller is laminarized by the guidance tunnel. In this setup, the fan has a larger volume of air available and the achieved static pressure values are higher. This is the optimum environment in which to measure fan parameters correctly. “Higher is better” (the result of static pressure in the charts) is only valid for comparing fans of the same formats. We have discussed what the quantity “static pressure” means and how to understand it in this article.
Why is there a missing value sometimes? There may be more reasons. Usually it is because the fan could not be adjusted to the target noise level. Some have a higher minimum speed (or the speed is low, but the motor is too noisy) or it is a slower fan that will not reach the higher decibels. But the results in the graphs are also missing if the impeller is brushing against the nylon filter mesh. In that case, we evaluate this combination as incompatible. And zero in the graphs is naturally also in situations where we measure 0.00. This is a common occurrence at extremely low speeds with obstructions or within vibration measurements.
- Contents
- DeepCool FT14 in detail
- Overview of specifications from the manufacturer
- Basis of the methodology, the wind tunnel
- Mounting and vibration measurement
- Initial warm-up and speed recording
- Base 6 equal noise levels...
- ... and sound color (frequency characteristic)
- Measurement of static pressure...
- ... and of airflow
- Everything changes with obstacles
- How we measure power draw and motor power
- Measuring the intensity (and power draw) of lighting
- Results: Speed
- Results: Airlow w/o obstacles
- Results: Airflow through a nylon filter
- Results: Airflow through a plastic filter
- Results: Airflow through a hexagonal grille
- Results: Airflow through a thinner radiator
- Results: Airflow through a thicker radiator
- Results: Static pressure w/o obstacles
- Results: Static pressure through a nylon filter
- Results: Static pressure through a plastic filter
- Results: Static pressure through a hexagonal grille
- Results: Static pressure through a thinner radiator
- Results: Static pressure through a thicker radiator
- Results: Static pressure, efficiency depending on orientation
- Reality vs. specifications
- Results: Frequency response of sound w/o obstacles
- Results: Frequency response of sound with a dust filter
- Results: Frequency response of sound with a hexagonal grille
- Results: Frequency response of sound with a radiator
- Results: Vibration, in total (3D vector length)
- Results: Vibration, X-axis
- Results: Vibration, Y-axis
- Results: Vibration, Z-axis
- Results: Power draw (and motor power)
- Results: Cooling performance per watt, airflow
- Results: Cooling performance per watt, static pressure
- Airflow per euro
- Static pressure per euro
- Results: Lighting – LED luminance and power draw
- Results: LED to motor power draw ratio
- Evaluation
That’s unexpected results. I would have guessed it performs better on radiators than vs no obstacles, but it’s the opposite!
Is the buzzing noise only present under ~750 RPM, or is it there across the whole speed range? On higher dBA settings, I can still see some of the peaks at 1-2 Khz.
There will probably be some buzzing at higher speeds, but because of the diminishing contribution to the total, in contrast with the aerodynamic noise (which drowns out these sounds) it fades out alongside other, significantly noisier frequencies. The buzzing is, of course, more pronounced at lower speeds (like ~750 rpm), at the limit of minimum rpm. But we don’t have a spectrogram for those. 🙂
Noticeable buzzing noise is present till the 20% of PWM or ~660RPM, have three of those on a 45mm rad :/
I mean buzzing is starting from 20% of PWM and 660RPM, and after 800-900RPM buzzing noise doesn’t bother because airflow noise is louder.
Little correction 🙂
Thank you for sharing your user experience. Yes, the buzzing noise also occurs at higher speeds, and the question is to what extent it is disruptive at which speed compared to the aerodynamic noise. This can be evaluated differently by everyone, as it is subjective.